Legal Personhood and Robotics: Birth of the Smart Android and of the Biodroid
Issue: 2023 - Volume 24 [Issue 5]
Philippe Fauquet-Alekhine *
SEBE-Lab, Department of Psychological & Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton St., WC2A 2AE, London, UK and INTRA Robotics, 37420, Beaumont-en-Veron, France and Lab. for Research in Science of Energy, France.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The adoption of legal resolutions or legislative proposals concerning the legal personality of Information Technology entities by the highest decision-making bodies has led to a significant increase in scientific studies on the subject in all disciplines. This sudden interest is a real necessity since, for example, the attribution of the legal status of electronic person to an artificial entity involves a multitude of multidisciplinary issues with potentially significant consequences. One of the legal issues addresses the concept of the birth of such an entity and its definition. As a corollary, the issue refers to that of the consciousness and death of such an entity. This article aims to make a contribution on this issue based on the French legal system. The analysis is illustrated by the application to two robotic entities, one real, the smart android, and the other fictional, the biodroid. By analogy with the case of humans, the birth of such entities corresponds to their first activation, and subsequently, whether they are turned on or off for its synthetic part, their birth is not questioned as long as their evolution is the result of their own development in complete autonomy. Similarly, any modification of their system of thought (including the destruction of this system) that is not due to their own autonomous development must be considered as the production of a new entity and therefore means the death of the previous version and the birth of the new version. These two main proposal are complemented by others that should clarify the issue, especially by defining how smart android and biodroid may be considered viable and dead. It also specifies the link with the status of electronic person.
Keywords: Android, artificial intelligence, biodroid, electronic person, emotional intelligence, personhood, smart robot
How to Cite
EU. Civil Law Rules on Robotics - European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations. Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). Brussels, Belgium; 2017.
EU. Civil Law Rules on Robotics - European Parliament resolution of 12 February 2019 on a comprehensive European industrial policy on artificial intelligence and robotics (2018/2088(INI)). Brussels, Belgium; 2019.
Fauquet-Alekhine Ph. Can the robot be considered a person? The European perspective. Advances in Research. 2022;23(6):100-105, Article no.AIR.94832.
Grinin L, Grinin A. The cybernetic revolution and the future of technologies. In: Picard RW, editor. The 21st Century Singularity and Global Futures Affective computing. MIT press; 2000:377-396.
Picard RW. Toward computers that recognize and respond to user emotion. IBM Systems Journal. 2000;39(3.4):705-719.
Volobuev AN, Romanov DV, Romanchuk PI. Nature and the human brain: paradigms of information exchange. Bulletin of Science and Practice [Bulletin of Science and Practice]. 2021;7(1):59-76. Russian.
Fauquet-Alekhine Ph. Scientific communication on artificial intelligence: the question of the social status of the biodroid. Advances in Research. 2022;23(5):1-5, Article no.AIR.89954.
Udayar S, Fiori M, Bausseron E. Emotional intelligence and performance in a stressful task: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Personality and Individual Differences. 2020;156;109790:1-6.
MacCann C, Jiang Y, Brown LE, Double KS, Bucich M, Minbashian A. Emotional intelligence predicts academic performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 2020 ;146(2):150.
Bongard J, Levin M. Living things are not (20th century) machines: updating mechanism metaphors in light of the modern science of machine behavior. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 2021;9:650726.
Grosenick L, Marshel JH, Deisseroth K. Closed-loop and activity-guided optogenetic control. Neuron. 2015;86(1):106-139.
Newman JP, Fong MF, Millard DC, Whitmire CJ, Stanley GB, Potter SM. Optogenetic feedback control of neural activity. Elife. 2015;4.
Pashaie R, Baumgartner R, Richner TJ, Brodnick SK, Azimipour M, Eliceiri KW, Williams JC. Closed-loop optogenetic brain interface. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2015;62(10):2327-2337.
Roy DS, Kitamura T, Okuyama T, Ogawa SK, Sun C, Obata Y, ... Tonegawa S. Distinct neural circuits for the formation and retrieval of episodic memories. Cell. 2017;170(5):1000-1012.
Nicolau DV. Editorial A (nother) New Beginning in 2020!. IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience. 2020;19(2):161- 161.
Aaser P, Knudsen M, Ramstad OH, van de Wijdeven R, Nichele S, Sandvig I., ... Valderhaug V. Towards making a cyborg: A closed-loop reservoir-neuro system. Artificial Life Conference Proceedings 14. MIT Press. 2017:430-437.
Stancati C, Gallo G. Could an Electronic Person Exist? Robots and Personal Responsibility. In: Giovagnoli R, Lowe R, editors. The Logic of Social Practices. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2020: 121-129.
Kelsen H. Reine Rechtslehre [Pure Theory of Law]. 2nd ed. Vienna: Franz Deuticke. 1960. German.
Yastrebov OA. The Legal Capacity of Electronic Person: Theoretical and Methodological Approaches. Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS. 2018;13(2):36-55.
Wettig S, Zehender E. A legal analysis of human and electronic agents. AI & L. 2004;12:111-135.
Fauquet-Alekhine Ph. Biodroids as embodied AI: an imminent social issue. In MW Bauer, B Schiele, editors. Science Communication – Taking a Step Back to Move Forward. Paris, CNRS Publishers. 2023:175-181.
Furusawa K, Teramae R, Ohashi H, Shimizu M. Development of Living “Bio-Robots” for Autonomous Actuations. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 2022;34(2):279-284.
Nicolau V, Andrei M. On Image Compression for Mobile Robots Using Feed-Forward Neural Networks. Soft Computing Applications: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop Soft Computing Applications (SOFA 2018). 2021;2(8):112-121.
Cornu G. Droit civil, Introduction, les personnes, les biens. Paris : Domat Droit privé, 9ème éd ; 1999.
Cornu G. Vocabulaire juridique: Association Henri Capitant. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France (12th edition). 2020. French.
Young PR. Persons and artificial intelligence. The Catholic University of America; 1991.
Mongeau SA. Opening the Overmind: The Culture and Philosophy of Virtual Reality. Doctoral dissertation, Miami University Oxford; 1993.
Karnow CE. The encrypted self: fleshing out the rights of electronic personalities. Journal of Computer & Information Law. 1994;13:1-16.
Melnikova EN. Integrity of the concept of electronic person in the legal system of the state or state education Russian legal journal [Russian Juridical Journal]. 2022;143(2):94-112. Russian.
Durneva PN. Artificial intelligence: analysis from the point of view of the classical theory of legal personality]. Civil law [Civil law]. 2019;(5):30-33. Russian.
List C. Group agency and artificial intelligence. Philosophy & technology. 2021;34(4):1213-1242.
World Robotics 2022 – Industrial Robots. Produced by VDMA Services GmbH, Lyoner Str. 18, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
Haidegger T, Galambos P, Rudas IJ. Robotics 4.0–Are we there yet?. In 2019 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES). 2019:000117-000124.
Haidegger T, "Taxonomy and Standards in Robotics". In Marcelo H. Ang, Oussama, Khatib, and Bruno Siciliano (eds), Encyclopedia of Robotics, Springer Nature, 2021.
Aubert JL. Introduction au droit et thèmes fondamentaux du droit civil. Paris: Armand Colin (7ème éd.); 1998. French.
Solms M, Friston K. How and why consciousness arises: some considerations from physics and physiology. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2018;25(5-6):202-238.
KoCh, C. When does consciousness arise. Scientific American Mind. 2009;20(5): 20-21.