Can the Robot be Considered a Person? The European Perspective

Philippe Fauquet-Alekhine *

SEBE-Lab, Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton St., WC2A 2AE, London, UK, Groupe INTRA Robotics, BP61, 37420, Avoine, France and Laboratory for Research in Science of Energy, France.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Technological advances are equipping robotic entities with artificial intelligence and endowed with emotional intelligence that gives them a capacity for reflection, analysis, that is closer every day to that of humans. The growing autonomy of robotic entities raises the question of legal responsibility for acts carried out by such entities at the same time as it raises the question of the status of such entities: should they be considered as persons or as things? The European Parliament adopted a resolution in 2017 that assumes that such entities could be granted the status of "electronic person". The question is how this can fit into the legal framework of the Member States of the European Community. This article proposes a first reflection on the thing-person transition of an autonomous robotic entity. The findings show that this transition is not immediate and requires both technological advances and an adjustment of the law.

Keywords: Android, artificial intelligence, boidroid, personality, personhood, robot

How to Cite

Fauquet-Alekhine, P. (2022). Can the Robot be Considered a Person? The European Perspective. Advances in Research, 23(6), 100–105.


Grinin L, Grinin A. The cybernetic revolution and the future of technologies. In The 21st century singularity and global futures. Springer, Cham. 2020;377-396.

HLEG (High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence). A definition of AI: Main capabilities and disciplines. Brussels: European Commission; 2019.

Udayar S, Fiori M, Bausseron E. Emotional intelligence and performance in a stressful task: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Personality and individual differences. 2020;156,109790:1-6.

MacCann C, Jiang Y, Brown LE, Double KS, Bucich M, Minbashian A. Emotional intelligence predicts academic performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 2020;146(2):150.

Mayer JD, Roberts RD, Barsade SG. Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology. 2008; 59:507-36.

Fauquet-Alekhine P. Biodroids as embodied AI: An imminent social issue. In MW Bauer, B Schiele. [eds] Science communication – Taking a step back to move forward, Paris, CNRS Publishers; 2022a. (In press).

Fauquet-Alekhine P. Scientific communication on artificial intelligence: The question of the social status of the biodroid. Advances in Research. 2022b; 23(5):1-5. Article no. AIR.89954.

EU. Civil law rules on robotics - European parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations. Commission on civil law rules on robotics (2015/2103(INL)). Brussels, Belgium; 2017.

EU. Open letter to the european commission - Artificial intelligence and robotics; 2018. Available:

List C. Group agency and artificial intelligence. Philosophy & technology. 2021;34(4):1213-1242.

BSI. Robots and robotic devices. Guide to the ethical design and application of robots and robotic systems. British Standards Institute, London, UK. 2016. Available:

Evas T. Public consultation on robotics and Artificial Intelligence - First (preliminary) results of public consultation. European Parliament, Brussels, Belgium; 2017.


Parviainen J, Coeckelbergh M. The political choreography of the sophia robot: Beyond robot rights and citizenship to political performances for the social robotics market. AI & Society. 2021; 36(3):715-724.

Guizzo E. By leaps and bounds: An exclusive look at how Boston dynamics is redefining robot agility. IEEE Spectrum. 2019;56(12):34-39.

Cho RLT, Liu JS, Ho MHC. The development of autonomous driving technology: Perspectives from patent citation analysis. Transport Reviews. 2021; 41(5):685-711.

De Bruyne J. “Driving” autonomous vehicles. Revue du droit des technologies de l’information. 2020;(75):86-95.

Abdelgaber N, Nikolopoulos C. Overview on quantum computing and its applications in artificial intelligence. In 2020 IEEE Third International conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering (AIKE). IEEE. 2020;198-199.

Reiter EH. Rethinking Civil-law taxonomy: Persons, Things, and the Problem of Domat's Monster. J. Civ. L. Stud. 2008; 1:189-213.

Trahan JR. The distinction between persons and things: An historical perspective. J. Civ. L. Stud. 2008;1: 9-20.

Aubert JL. Introduction au droit et thèmes fondamentaux du droit civil. Paris: Armand Colin (7ème éd.); 1998.

Volobuev A, Romanov D, Romanchuk P. Nature and human brain: information exchange paradigms. Bulletin of Science and Practice. 2021;7(1):59-76.