Monitoring and Management of Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) in pear (Pyrus communis L.) in the Shevaroy Hills of Tamil Nadu

M. Senthil Kumar

Horticultural Research Station, Yercaud, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu, India.

M. Deivamani *

Regional Research Station, Paiyur, Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu, India.

P. Senthilkumar

Regional Research Station, Paiyur, Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu, India.

K. Govindan

Regional Research Station, Paiyur, Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu, India.

P. Ayyadurai

Centre of Excellence for Millets, Athiyandal, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu, India.

K. Sasikumar

Regional Research Station, Paiyur, Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu, India.

V. K. Satya

Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2024–25 in a farmer’s pear orchard at Manjakuttai, Yercaud, Tamil Nadu, to monitor the seasonal abundance of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) in pear (Pyrus communis L., Var. Local) and compare an integrated pest management (IPM) module with the farmer’s chemical control practice and an untreated control. The experiment followed a randomised block design with three treatments and seven replications. Adult activity was monitored weekly with ten methyl eugenol–baited parapheromone traps during standard weeks (SW) 7–16 (12 February–22 April 2025). Trap catches increased from 13 to 22 flies/10 traps during SW 7–11, stabilised at 18–19 during SW 12–13, declined to 11 and 9 during SW 14–15, and increased to 28 during SW 16. Minimum humidity showed the strongest association with trap catches (r = 0.7989, p = 0.0056), explaining 63.83% of the variation in the simple regression. Maximum humidity, rainfall, minimum temperature, and maximum temperature showed positive but non-significant correlations over the full monitoring period. The five-variable regression explained 97.79% of the observed variation, although the estimate is based on only ten weekly observations. Cumulative rainfall of 63.2 mm during SW 14–16 coincided with the final population resurgence. The findings indicate that adult B. dorsalis is present before pear fruiting and support early monitoring and timely IPM intervention. Harvest-stage fruit damage, yield, and benefit–cost data were still pending during the reported monitoring period.

Keywords: Bactrocera dorsalis, oriental fruit fly, pear, Pyrus communis, methyl eugenol trap, population dynamics, weather parameters


How to Cite

Kumar, M. Senthil, M. Deivamani, P. Senthilkumar, K. Govindan, P. Ayyadurai, K. Sasikumar, and V. K. Satya. 2026. “Monitoring and Management of Fruit Fly, Bactrocera Dorsalis (Hendel) in Pear (Pyrus Communis L.) in the Shevaroy Hills of Tamil Nadu”. Advances in Research 27 (6):137-57. https://doi.org/10.9734/air/2026/v27i61762.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.