Economic Feasibility of a CAET Developed Vacuum Assisted Osmotic Dehydration Unit for Pineapple Slices
Rinkesh A. Gosavi *
Department of Processing and Food Engineering, CAET, BSKKV, Dapoli, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India.
A. A. Sawant
Department of Processing and Food Engineering, CAET, BSKKV, Dapoli, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India.
A. G. Mohod
SSS-NIBE, Kapurthala, Punjab, India.
S. V. Pathak
Department of Agricultural Engineering, COA, Dr. BSKKV, Dapoli, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India.
P. B. Bansode
Department of Statistics, CAET, BSKKV, Dapoli, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India.
S. B. Kalse
Department of Processing and Food Engineering, CAET, BSKKV, Dapoli, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The economic feasibility of a vacuum osmotic dehydration (VOD)-based processing system for pineapple slices was evaluated for potential small-scale application. The developed VOD unit had a batch capacity of 8 kg and a fabrication cost of ₹66,700. Economic assessment was undertaken for the complete processing system, including the VOD unit, vacuum dryer, packaging equipment, utensils and associated infrastructure. The estimated fixed capital investment was ₹3,87,700, while the annual working capital requirement was ₹10,94,100. Based on an operating schedule of 8 h per day and 25 working days per month, the annual production cost was estimated at ₹11,63,816. At the assumed selling price of ₹610 kg⁻¹, the estimated annual revenue was ₹16,46,194.8, resulting in an annual net return of ₹4,82,378.8. The corresponding benefit–cost ratio was 1.40 and the return on revenue was 29.30%. The estimated break-even point was 27.58%, while the payback period was 0.74 years under the assumptions used in the analysis. The calculated production cost of vacuum osmotically dehydrated and vacuum-dried pineapple slices was approximately ₹431 kg⁻¹. These results indicate that the proposed processing system may have potential for small-scale pineapple value addition under the stated production, cost and selling-price assumptions. Further evaluation under varying raw-material, energy, product-recovery and market-price conditions would be useful for assessing the robustness of the projected economic performance.
Keywords: Pineapple, vacuum osmotic dehydration, cost economics, production cost, benefit–cost ratio, break-even point, payback period, cottage-scale processing