Main Article Content
Being purposed at understanding the utilization efficiency of excavated and/or reclaimed ponds as newly created assets under the MGNREGS, the present study was conducted at Dhalai district of Tripura state (India) with the objectives to: i) comprehend the physical performance of pond excavation and reclamation works under MGNREGS; and ii) peruse the nature of harnessing of the created assets at beneficiary level during post work execution phase of the scheme. While the first objective was addressed through utilizing secondary information, the second one was attained through administering separate sets of pre-tested structured interview schedule over 92 MGNREGS beneficiaries and 27 functionaries remained responsible for effective implementation of the scheme. Study revealed that the district had executed 16717 no. of works combining both pond excavation and reclamation jobs during 2012-13 to 2016-17, of which the shares of pond excavation and reclamation works were 81.77% and 18.23%, respectively. Despite such good physical performance in work execution, very poor accrual of average annual fish productivity (414.25 kg ha-1) was recorded at the fish ponds of beneficiaries. It lagged by 5.98 times from the state average and 5.74 times from the average of even Dhalai district, where the study was conducted. Although 66.30% of the beneficiaries of MGNREGS had no previous experience of culture fisheries as they became first ever owners of pond, a staggering 67.39% of them didn’t receive any knowledge vis-a-vis skill enabling training on scientific aquaculture, which led to disappointing extents of their knowledge (34.75%) and adoption (32.85%) of scientific aquaculture. Garrett ranking revealed ‘lack of systematic and timely supply of critical inputs from the Fisheries Department’ and ‘lack of training facilities’ to be the two prime perceived constraints of the beneficiary respondents. The two most important suggestions emanated from them were: ‘timely provisioning of critical inputs from the Dept. of Fisheries’ and ‘arranging of more longer duration hands-on training programmes to make those really worthy for the fish farmers’.
Ministry of Rural Development, Govt. of India. National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (2005): Operational Guidelines (3rd Edn.). Department of Rural Development, Govt. of India. New Delhi. 2008;1-4.
(Accessed 12 March 2018)
Mondal S. Text book of agricultural extension with global innovations. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi. 2013;203-207.
Koyu B. An evaluative study on the impact of MGNREGA in Arunachal Pradesh. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis. Submitted to school of social sciences, College of Post-Graduate Studies, Central Agricultural University, Umiam, Meghalaya, India. 2015;39-40.
Ijardar RS. Influence of MGNREGA on aquaculture: A case study in West Tripura. M.F.Sc. Thesis submitted to department of extension and social sciences, College of Fisheries, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Lembucherra, Tripura, India. 2017;1-4.
Ministry of Rural Development, Govt. of India. Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (2005): Operational Guidelines (4th Edn.). Department of Rural Development, Govt. of India, New Delhi. 2013;181-223.
Census of India. Provisional population totals: Figures at a glance. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi; 2011.
Saha B, Pandit A. Fish farming practices of Tripura: A socio – economic perspective. J. Inland Fish. Soc. India. 2014;46(2):41-47.
Debnath B, Biradar RS, Pandey SK, Krishnan M, Shyam S, Salim SS. Present status and prospects of fisheries resources, fish seed and fish availability in Tripura. Journal of Fisheries, Economics and Development. 2013;14(1):30-41.
Ijardar RS, Sarkar A, Upadhyay AD, Biswas P, Singh YJ. Performance of MGNREGS - Aquaculture convergence: A study in Tripura, India. International Journal of Stress and Management. 2017;8(4):574-580.
Directorate of Fisheries, Govt. of Tripura, (2014). Mandate of the department.
(Accessed: 26 April 2018)
Ministry of Rural Development. The MGNREGA: Status of work completion (State: Tripura). Government of India, New Delhi; 2018.
(Accessed: 20 March 2019)
Directorate of Fisheries, Govt. of Tripura. District and year wise status of area and production under culture fisheries in Tripura. 2018;1-2.
Saha B, Singh NN, Pandey DK. Knowledge and adoption of improved practices of carp production at Tripura in India: Intramural project report, Central Agricultural University, Imphal. 2010;25-26.
Garrett HE, Woodworth RS. Statistics in Psychology and Education. Vakils, Fetter and Simons Pvt. Ltd. Bombay. 1969;329.
Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. (3rd Edn.). The Free Press, New York. 1983;21-22.
Haque A. Study of some factors related to the adoption of recommended species of fish in composite fish culture. Doctoral thesis, BCKV, Mohanpur, India. 1981;69-73.
Talukdar PK, Sontaki BS. Correlates of adoption of composite fish culture practices by fish farmers of Assam, India. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 2005;1(1):12-18.
Goswami B, Mukhopadhyay SB, Dana SS. A study on factors influencing the adoption behaviour of fish farmers with special reference to scientific fish culture in West Bengal, India. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management. 2015;3(3):362-367.
Singh AK, Singh GP, Singh B. Correlates of farmers’ knowledge of improved chickpea production technology. Indian Journal of Extension Education. 2002;38(3&4):162-167.