Design and Implementation of a Standardised Clinical Decision Support Algorithm for Fever

P. O. Ana

Department of Computer Science, University of Cross River State, Nigeria.

A. E. Edim

Department of Computer Science, University of Calabar, Nigeria.

U. J. Ekah *

Department of Physics, University of Cross River State, Nigeria.

G. A. Inyang

Department of Computer Science, University of Cross River State, Nigeria.

F. P. Ana

Department of Computer and Information Systems, Adeleke University, Nigeria.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


This study aims to design a decision support tool to assist in providing quality treatment that is consistent with World Health Organization (WHO) and Nigerian National guidelines. The system is designed to allow clinicians to administer care within their competent level working from one algorithm. The system will help them to identify emergencies associated with fever symptoms and to recommend stabilisation actions before a referral is made. This new system allows structured assessment of patients who should receive optimal care and improved data transmission to the next caregiver. In this study, we used an explanatory approach, starting with the quantitative data collection phase which is the administration of questionnaires and Pre and Post questionnaires followed by qualitative data from focus group discussions over the clinician experience using the Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS). Focus group discussions were performed to authenticate the quantitative data to have a more holistic view of the CDSS. Using elements of the decision support system together with the clinician's decision showed that the clinicians felt that they worked more systematically and communicated more effectively with others. They felt more professional when using the decision support system. 73% of clinicians reported using CDSS in almost every consultation and 93% used the CDSS in the majority of their consultations during the three-month testing period. The mean total test score before the CDSS was 2.5 and this increased by the end of the test period to a mean score of 9.6, an improvement of 74.4%.  The results of this study showed that with the help of a decision support system, patients were properly identified and stabilised before they were referred, and the clinicians stayed on their competency level. It allowed caregivers to interact professionally without bias. However, the decision support system requires more extensive testing to enhance the evidence base relating to the vital parameters and the use of the decision support system.

Keywords: Emergency healthcare, decision-making and referral, algorithm for fever, clinical decision support algorithm

How to Cite

Ana, P. O., Edim, A. E., Ekah, U. J., Inyang, G. A., & Ana, F. P. (2024). Design and Implementation of a Standardised Clinical Decision Support Algorithm for Fever. Advances in Research, 25(4), 87–98.


Download data is not yet available.


Chen Z, Liang, N, Zhang H, Li H, Yang Y, Zong X, Chen Y, Wang Y, Shi N. Harnessing the power of clinical decision support systems: Challenges and opportunities. Open Heart. 2023;10(2):1-11.

Lu W, Jiang W, Zhang N, Xue F. Design of intelligent nursing decision support system based on Multiattribute decision model. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2022;1-9.

Lefchak B, Bergmann KR, Lammers S, Hester GZ. Piloting a mobile clinical decision support application for pediatric clinical guidelines. Clinical Pediatrics; 2023.

Sànchez-Marrè M. Model-driven intelligent decision support systems. Intelligent Decision Support Systems. 2022;117-223. Available:

Suroso AM. WEB-based decision support system for mobile selection using the simple additive weighting method. Journal of Intelligent Decision Support System (IDSS). 2021;4(3):64-71.

Gordon WJ, Landman A, Zhang H, Bates DW. Beyond validation: Getting health apps into clinical practice. npj Digital Medicine. 2020;3(1).

Michalowski W, Rubin S, Slowinski R, Wilk S. Mobile clinical support system for pediatric emergencies. Decision Support Systems. 2003;36(2):161 -176.

Tamrat T, Kachnowski S. Special delivery: An analysis of mHealth in maternal and newborn health programs and their outcomes around the world. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2011;16(5):1092-1101.

Oluoch T, Santas X, Kwaro D, Were M, Biondich P, Bailey C, Abu-Hanna A, De Keizer N. The effect of electronic medical record-based clinical decision support on HIV care in resource-constrained settings: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2012;81(10):e83-e92.

Shahmoradi L, Safdari R, Ahmadi H, Zahmatkeshan M. Clinical decision support systems-based interventions to improve medication outcomes: A systematic literature review on features and effects. Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran; 2021.

Chan K. Mechanisms of drug interactions. Interactions Between Chinese Herbal Medicinal Products and Orthodox Drugs. 200;17-26.

Braun R, Catalani C, Wimbush J, Israelski D. Community health workers and mobile technology: a systematic review of the literature. PloS One. 2013;8(6): e65772.

Tengland P, Rämgård M. Health promotion and empowerment in collaboration: Theoretical underpinnings and methodological challenges when creating a health equity program in a vulnerable area; 2022.

Collins A. Toward a design science of education. In Scanlon, E. and O’Shea, T. (eds.) New Directions in Educational Technology, pp 123–130. Berlin: Springer; 1992.

Scott EE, Wenderoth MP, Doherty JH. Design-based research: A methodology to extend and enrich biology education research. CBE— Life Sciences Education. 2020;19(3): es11.