Main Article Content
This paper examined the impact of social entrepreneurship on sustainability of business development in Nigeria. The objectives of the study include: to identify major evolution experienced by social enterprise in Nigeria, to identify key challenges in social entrepreneurship in Nigeria, to identify current trends in social entrepreneurship in Nigeria, and to carry out an analysis on sources of funds for financing the social entrepreneurs. Survey approach was the research design used with particular reference to selected small and medium enterprises (SME) in Nigeria. It was observed that political factors, economic factors, socio-cultural factors, cross country factors and technological factors are the major evolution experienced by social enterprise in Nigeria. It was also observed that lack of education in entrepreneurship, lack of financial assistance, comparative disadvantages to business, lack of government support and lack of skilled manpower are the key challenges in social entrepreneurship in Nigeria. The current trends in social entrepreneurship in Nigeria are social media and the role of technology, rise of decentralized micro-giving opportunities, cross-sector partnerships and government drive for an all-inclusive economic growth and development through SME. The analysis carried out on sources of funds for financing the social entrepreneurs are contributions from social entrepreneurs, subventions from government, donor supports, loans and advances and retained earnings/reserves.
Krueger NF, Brazael DV. Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1994;18(3):91–105.
Zahra SA, Gedajlovic E, Neubaum DO, Shulman JM. A typology of social entre-preneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing. 2009;24:519-532.
Harding R, Cowling M. Social entre-preneurship monitor. Global Entrepreneur-ship Monitor UK, London: London Business School; 2006.
Kramer MR. Measuring innovation: Evaluation in the field of social entrepreneurship. Skoll Foundation, Palo Alto, ca; 2005.
Baumol WJ. Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive and destructive. Journal of Political Economy. 1990;98(5):893–921.
Šušteršič J, Wostner P, Valič TB. Qua vadis, slovenia? Between framework conditions and internal capabilities. Managing Global Transitions. 2010;8(4): 21–34.
Naudé W. Peace, prosperity, and pro-growth entrepreneurship. Discussion Paper United Nations University, Helsinki; 2007.
Welter F, Smallbone D. Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. Journal of Small Business Management. 2011;49(1): 107–25.
Dees JG. Social entrepreneurship is about innovation and impact, not income, discussion paper on social edge; 2003.
Austin J, Stevenson H, WeiSkillern J. Social entrepreneurship and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Harvard Business Review. 2003;04029.
Alvord SH, Brown LD, Letts CW. Social entrepreneurship and social transforma-tion: An exploratory study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2004;40:260- 282.
Stevenson HH, Roberts MJ, Grousbeck HI. New business ventures and the entre-preneur. Homewood: IL; 1989.
Bornstein D. How to change the world social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. Oxford University Press: Oxford; 2004.
Seelos C, Mair J. Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons. 2005;48(3):241-246.
Reis TK, Clohesy SJ. Unleashing new resources and entrepreneurship for the common good: A philanthropic renaissance. New Directions of Philanthropic Fundraising. 2001;32:109- 144.
Ishengoma E, Kappel R. Economic growth and poverty: Does formalization of informal enterprises matter? GIGA Working Papers. 2006;20.
Temu SS. Microfinance institutions and poverty alleviation in Tanzania: A review of current practices. Paper Presented at the 1st IFMASA Workshop on Poverty Alleviation and Financial Management System in Tanzania, held at IFM, DSM; 2000.